Grievance Procedure
- Time Standards Time limits set forth for filing and appealing grievances, must be strictly followed by the grievant. Mutually agreeable adjustments in the time period for holding a review meeting and in issuing an answer may be made due to the unavailability of a necessary party. The grievance is considered settled on the basis of the last answer if the grievant fails to appear at a scheduled review meeting or does not appeal on a timely basis. When both parties in a formal grievance process request it, the time clock on the grievance procedure may be stopped for a time period satisfactory to both parties to allow for a good faith attempt to resolve the conflict or disagreement through mediation.
- Modification The progression from Steps 1 through 3 (see attached procedures) may be modified by the University by reducing the number of steps for grievance resolution where the origin of the grievance, the operational unit involved, or the content and scope of the grievance makes that progression impractical. In addition, at the option of the grievant, the grievance may begin at a level above the supervisor involved if the grievance alleges unlawful discrimination by such supervisor.
- Assistance in Review Meetings An employee may select any individual (except an employee who is included in a University collective bargaining unit or the grievant's immediate supervisor) to assist in the review meetings at Steps 2 and 3. If the assistant is a University employee, the assistant will not lose time or pay for attending meetings held during the assistant's normal working hours.
- No Loss of Time or Pay An employee's attendance at a grievance review meeting held during normal working hours shall be with pay. Any other time spent in formulating or preparing a grievance shall be done outside the regular work schedule and shall be without compensation.
- Discipline Grievances Grievances concerning discharge, disciplinary layoff, a written reprimand in lieu of a disciplinary layoff, alleged sexual and gender-based misconduct or alleged unlawful discrimination will begin at Step 3.
- University Grievance Review Committee The University Grievance Review Committee includes the head of the aggrieved employee's operating unit, or a designated representative, who is responsible for the answer; an appropriate Director of Human Resources or a designated representative, who will preside and is responsible for conducting the review; and an employee not employed in the vice presidential or vice chancellor area in which the aggrieved employee works, who will be selected by the aggrieved employee from a panel appointed by the Vice Presidents and Vice Chancellors. When unlawful discrimination is alleged, the committee will also include a representative of ECRT. The conduct of the meeting is prescribed by the University. The employee will have an opportunity to present all relevant information to the University Review Committee during the meeting. The Committee will consider this information in formulating its response. Participants should not expect that witnesses will be called, testimony taken or that the proceedings will be recorded electronically. The University Grievance Review Committee may explore the context in which the grievance occurred and consider other remedies. When one or more members of the committee do not agree with the grievance answer proposed by the operating unit, the member(s) may present concerns to the appropriate Executive Officer or designee for review.
- Limits on Financial Reimbursement Except as otherwise specifically provided, University liability for back wages or other financial reimbursement is limited to the period of 30 calendar days prior to the University's knowledge of the facts brought to the University's attention through this procedure.
This policy was reviewed in January 2013. No changes were made.
This SPG was updated on March 1, 2018 to update the name of the Health System to Michigan Medicine, and to provide a link to the Grievance Procedures.
This SPG was updated in March 2022 to reflect the interface with the new SPG 601.89 Sexual and Gender Based Misconduct and related processes, and cross-reference to SPG 601.90 Protection from Retaliation. Also, reflects updated office name for ECRT, and availability of confidential counseling via the Staff Ombuds Office. And, has clarifying language in the “applies to” section that this policy would continue to apply in instances where there is no collective bargaining agreement yet in place.